Jump to content

Match Thread (for non Canada games)


narduch

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, football_world said:

Now that is the textbook definition of bunkering.  Very nice bunkering by Morocco, coaches in the future will be studying how Morocco bunkered against Spain.

The interesting part of Morocco's bunker is, it was a very compact bunker.  Morocco was voluntarily letting Spain walk up to about 65% up the field without challenging Spain.  The striker for Morocco was positioned around the 35% part of Morocco's side.  But once Spain tried to pass into the remaining 35% of Morocco's side, that's where the turnovers happened for Spain.

Also, Morocco's defense was very organized.  Heck, the entire team was very organized on defense. Very impressive bunkering defense.

In hindsight, I think Canada should have bunkered against Croatia. Did anybody watch the Morocco vs Croatia game, did Morocco bunker against Croatia?

I really doubt our D could hold up playing so deep for a whole game, plus extra time. I think we needed to play conservatively and always have three or four back, with the mid line not pushing too high either, but I don't think we would have kept the ball out of the net if we played as deep as Morocco. They had 8 or 9 guys in the box for a good chunk of the game. 

Edited by Cicero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Trois Reds said:

Unless Switzerland beats Portugal, Canada's group is the only one to have two quarterfinalists.  So I'd say our group was the real Group of Death, and we did okay.

Edit: I was beaten to this conclusion by @ob1.

The dead making observations about the living. Ours was the Group of Life because it has the highest survival rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Trois Reds said:

50% of all teams making it through for all groups makes this observation dead.

Obviously we were in a tough group, I feel somewhat vindicated. Was just playing with the idea that we're the only group with 2 through.

We lacked maturity and a bit of the long view, we were rushed and immature.

Edited by Unnamed Trialist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Big_M said:

enrique looked completely defeated before the penalty kick session started..thats a bad sign and you knew right there they were losing it..cant have a coach like that

He just said on RTVE that he chose the three first takers, and let the players decide the rest. And all three shot terribly, embarrassing shots. 

He even did that smartass move to take Nico Williams off, who had created more offense than the entire team as a late sub, and was still terrorising down the right, so Sarabia, who has not played a minute at the WC, could take that wonder of a spot kick.

No one is that upset in Spain because this team has no stars, there is not one guy there in the top 20 in the world, maybe not even top 30.

Not saying there are clearly better players out there, but you have to take some more killer strikers with heavy bodies, and you need mids who are not afraid to take a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jonovision said:

I'm not hugely invested in the Messi-Ronaldo rivalry, but wouldn't it be funny if Messi led his team to a World Cup win while Ronaldo pouted his way to a bench spot and a transfer to Saudi Arabian retirement in their respective last WC finals?

Legit wondering if we could see Messi in 2026. He'd be 38 turning 39 during the tournament...so it wouldn't that shocking tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't agree about Canada's group being the "group of death." Yes, both Morocco and Croatia advanced, but on penalties and not against the tournament's best teams.

Morocco is hard to beat because they don't concede easily, but drawing them is quite doable and Canada came close. Croatia scored 1 goal in 5 hours of play against Morocco, Belgium and Japan - Canada conceded >13x as many goals per hour vs Croatia. And Belgium turned out to be by far the worst Pot 1 team other than Qatar.

Hardest group to get a point, maybe, because Morocco turned out to be the best team of Pot 3 (along with Japan). But not the hardest group to get out of because of Belgium's weakness. Needed to beat Belgium (as Canada deserved), draw Croatia (as all of Croatia's other opponents did) and draw Morocco (as almost happened). I think G was harder to get out of, and maybe E too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Allez les Rouges said:

Don't agree about Canada's group being the "group of death." Yes, both Morocco and Croatia advanced, but on penalties and not against the tournament's best teams.

Morocco is hard to beat because they don't concede easily, but drawing them is quite doable and Canada came close. Croatia scored 1 goal in 5 hours of play against Morocco, Belgium and Japan - Canada conceded >13x as many goals per hour vs Croatia. And Belgium turned out to be by far the worst Pot 1 team other than Qatar.

Hardest group to get a point, maybe, because Morocco turned out to be the best team of Pot 3 (along with Japan). But not the hardest group to get out of because of Belgium's weakness. Needed to beat Belgium (as Canada deserved), draw Croatia (as all of Croatia's other opponents did) and draw Morocco (as almost happened). I think G was harder to get out of, and maybe E too.

You're probably right, but it's also not clear at all to me who are the tournament's best teams. Of the remaining teams, only Brazil, France and England have been mostly dominant, although all took a match off.

Edited by jonovision
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jonovision said:

You're probably right, but it's also not clear at all to me who are the tournament's best teams. Of the remaining teams, only Brazil, France and England have been mostly dominant, although all took a match off.

Of course Englands Off match had to be against the Americans  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...