WCQ: Third Round - Window 4 (January 27- February 2, 2022)

[TGAA_Star]

I fully swear with a win against Costa Rica, we can mathematically qualify because we would have 28 points whereas USA if they beat Mexico they would have 24 points so we would be 4 points clear of them. Or if Mexico beats USA, they too would have 24 points and we would still be 4 points clear provided we beat Costa Rica.

[Allez les Rouges]

49 minutes ago, TGAA_Star said:

I fully swear with a win against Costa Rica, we can mathematically qualify because we would have 28 points whereas USA if they beat Mexico they would have 24 points so we would be 4 points clear of them. Or if Mexico beats USA, they too would have 24 points and we would still be 4 points clear provided we beat Costa Rica.

All the clinching scenarios below.

On 2/2/2022 at 8:56 PM, Allez les Rouges said:

So Mexico's win clinches 4th for Canada! It's 6 more points needed for 1st and 2 points for qualification.

More precisely, on Day 12:

- Canada cannot clinch 1st (MEX and USA cannot simultaneously lose since they play each other).

- Canada qualifies with any of:

a) win at CRC

b) tie at CRC and either PAN draw/loss vs. HON or MEX win/draw vs. USA

c) loss at CRC, PAN draw/loss vs. HON and MEX win vs. USA

[rydermike]

On 2/3/2022 at 3:00 PM, Allez les Rouges said:

 

Edited

Edited February 5, 2022 by rydermike

[Cblake]

Man the bounces the ball took, still can not believe it. Unreal.

[Allez les Rouges]

On 2/4/2022 at 6:37 PM, rydermike said:

 

 

Edited February 9, 2022 by Allez les Rouges
Quoted comment deleted

[rkomar]

I think the cartoon of the goal is slightly off.  It looked like the ball came off Zavaleta's leg, and then hit Atiba in two places before lofting into the goal.  It's even crazier than the artist thought.

[rydermike]

3 hours ago, Allez les Rouges said:

Yes, people that aren't totally clueless know how Wikipedia works. Thanks for your pedantry.

Sorry for being sounding pedantic and I know everyone knows everyone can update it, your post to me seemed like you were blaming the Wikipedia for updating it wrong then correcting rather some eager person. I just shouldn't post late at night easier to know better what to just read between the lines on.  I'm just going to get rid of that comment. 

Edited February 5, 2022 by rydermike

[rydermike]

On 2/3/2022 at 2:40 PM, narduch said:

2 Canadians on team of the match day.

 

Honourable mention: The law of physics for scoring our goal

[TGAA_Star]

8 hours ago, Allez les Rouges said:

All the clinching scenarios below.

Then this is definitely reassuring...then I'm hoping for a win or a draw...really good with either or to be honest 

[narduch]

More covid drama

Read the google translation and sounds like Montes tested positive after. Not sure what Panama is complaining about.

 

Edited February 5, 2022 by narduch

[TOcanadafan]

Panama has more of a case to argue that they were done in by a dubious penalty.  
 

It probably has come up before, but who is in charge on the Covid testing?  If it’s the individual teams then I can see why this sort of claim might surface.  

[A_Gagne]

17 hours ago, JAVIERF said:

If they were positives, they still cant play.  So Mexico could also ask for the points as well.  

You can test positive on a PCR test up to 3 months after you've recovered from the disease itself, so it's a fairly useless test within 3 months of a known documented infection.

[Gian-Luca]

https://www.tsn.ca/video/osorio-we-re-confident-that-we-ll-do-it-but-we-re-not-saying-we-ve-already-qualified~2376210

[Allez les Rouges]

On 2/5/2022 at 12:48 AM, rydermike said:

Sorry for being sounding pedantic and I know everyone knows everyone can update it, your post to me seemed like you were blaming the Wikipedia for updating it wrong then correcting rather some eager person. I just shouldn't post late at night easier to know better what to just read between the lines on.  I'm just going to get rid of that comment. 

Thanks and no worries - I could've phrased my original post more clearly. Deleted my reply to you too